Joyful, wartime simplicity
This post marks the revival of my blog. No promises, but hopefully it doesn’t die again.
During the last days of my honeymoon, while staying in Bali with Rachelle’s friend Englyn, her husband Ben and their kids, I spent time flicking through a book we bought for Ben for his birthday last year. The book is titled “Brothers, We Are Not Professionals” by John Piper, and the following paragraph (and the chapter it was part of) really got my attention:
Very few of our people have said to themselves: we will live at a level of joyful, wartime simplicity and use the rest of what we earn to alleviate misery. But surely that is what Jesus wants. I do not see how we can read the New Testament, then look at two billion unevangelized people, and still build another barn for ourselves [a reference to Luke 12:13-21]. We can only justify the exorbitance of our lifestyle by ignoring the lostness of the unreached and the misery of the poor.
After being in Indonesia for five weeks, and almost daily seeing kids risk their lives as human traffic cones and barefoot senior citizens collecting rubbish, this got me thinking to say the least. But it raises a whole bunch of questions:
- Where do you draw the line between simplicity and luxury, between needs and wants?
- Similarly, but on a more personal level, at what point am I willing to sacrifice my personal comfort/amusement for the sake of another?
- And if you feel moved to give, is it better to meet the needs of others now or invest so that you can give more later?
That last one is probably the most relevant to most of us, because most people DO have a desire to help the less fortunate (if you have no social conscience you should probably spend some time mulling over the first two). If I had given away everything I earned as a 20 year-old (thousands of dollars), the 30 year-old me would not be in a position to even consider giving tens of thousands of dollars.
Hmmm... (universally accepted as signifying thinking while writing?)
Perhaps the right equation looks something like this:
Things that cost a lot just because of the brand = bad
Activities with relational benefit (e.g. dinner with friends) = good
Investing wisely so that I’m able to do more with each year that passes = good
Not starving, being homeless and needing charity myself = very good!
Giving as much as I can without compromising any of the good or very good things = best
What do you think?
